top of page

Comprehensive or Targeted Fee Study

Updated: Sep 14, 2020

There are two different approaches to doing a Fee Study.  You can either do a comprehensive study that involves the entire organization or do a more targeted approach that just reviews departments with a large amount of fee revenues.  There are pros and cons to each approach.


Comprehensive Fee Study


The main benefit of this approach is that it is comprehensive.  This insures that all possible fees are studied and included in the Study and also makes sure that each fee includes all departments that are involved in providing the service.  Another benefit is that the comprehensive approach identifies the costs of all services provided by the City, including non-fee tax supported services.  This becomes important during the Council presentation because you can now precisely identify the cost of the services that use tax dollars.  This now makes real the services that cannot be completely funded due to subsidies provided to services that benefit specific individuals and could be charged a fee.  This helps to change the dynamic for the City Council to one of lowering tax subsidies instead of just raising fees.


A con of this approach is that you will spend time, and money, reviewing departments that have little or no fee potential.  But this work could be beneficial if it results in new policy directions due to the calculation of the costs of providing the services, such as with Recreation services.


Targeted Fee Study


The main benefit of this approach is that you are focusing your time and money on those departments that have the largest potential benefit of new fees, such as Community Development fees.  So, you’re getting the biggest bang for your buck.  While this does not identify the cost of the tax services, it still identifies the total subsidy of tax dollars, which allows you to make the general argument about tax dollars supporting tax services.


But, of course, you can’t insure that you have captured all the costs for fee-related services.  In other words, you may be leaving money on the table.

Whichever approach you choose, just make sure that you understand what the end product looks like and that it is in line with your fee recovery goals.

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comparing Your Fees to Other Cities?

Before the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, I was a finance director in California. Annually, finance directors would calculate the property tax mill rate to balance their city’s budget. Fees for se

Next Steps After a Fee Update

So you have just updated your fees and you are justifiably proud of this accomplishment. Now, what’s next? You could just rest on your laurels and then scramble around in five to ten years when you

bottom of page