top of page

Services Limited by State Laws

Updated: Sep 13, 2021

While performing a fee update and going through the hundreds of different fees and fines which a city may have, we noticed some fees exceeding what is currently set by State laws. This may be due to changes in State law, but more commonly, it’s because cities update all fees using a Consumer Price Index increase and forget about these limitations.

While one might say all fees are limited to full cost recovery, these fees hurt the cities’ pocketbooks and the maximum fee amount doesn’t come close to full cost recovery. From our perspective, initiative filing is the most consuming of staff time with the least cost recovery. It’s common for a city to spend 80-120 hours of the City Clerk’s time, plus legal, to verify, review and process a local initiative. What the city gets in return is $200, which is fully refundable if the initiative makes it onto the ballot.

One complaint we hear everywhere we go is the time it takes to process records requests. Under the Public Records Act, cities cannot more than the actual cost of reproduction for such requests. However, a recent court case determined that the City of Hayward may require the requestor to pay for costs to review, redact and produce police bodycam videos (National Lawyers Guild vs City of Hayward, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3, 2018). Could this lead to a city’s ability to charge for redaction of other city files and documents?

Below is a current list of fees regulated by the State. Keep this handy when you next update your user fees, or feel free to contact RCS and we would be happy to assist you.


Conduct an annual background check for a for-profit bingo operator in order to preserve and insure the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. This fee is limited by State law

$50 per permit Remote Caller – Actual Cost


Processing an application for an intent to run for a City elected office. This fee is limited by State law

$25 per candidate


Providing photocopies of City documents. California Government Code 81008

$0.10 per page – FPPC related document

Reproduction Costs – Other documents


Processing a request for a concealed weapon permit within the City. California Penal Code Sections 12050-12054 and 2619(a) New Permit – $100 ($20 paid at time of application with remaining amount paid upon

issuing of permit) Renewal Permit – $25 Amended Permit – $10 Psychological testing costs are added to the above fees up to $150


Time spent responding to accidents with a DUI involvement. California Government Code 53155

Charge the actual costs incurred up to $12,000 per response for all responding



Processing a firearm seizure, impounding, storage and release when required as part of a court action. California Penal Code 12021.3(j)(1)

$245 plus $1 per firearm per day for storage


Processing an intent to place a local initiative on the ballot. This fee is limited by State law

$200 per initiative, fully refundable if initiative is placed on ballot


Providing notary service to the general public. California Government Code 8211



City providing requested documents and media, as permissible under State laws.

$5.00 – Retrieval of FPPC filings 5 or more years old


Processing of a notification that a vehicle has been repossessed. California Government Code 26751



Inspection of certain occupancies required by the State Fire Marshal to insure compliance with fire safety codes and regulations. These fees are set by State law

Residential Care Facility:

1-25 persons – $50

26+ persons – $100


Subpoenaed employee - $275 per day (CA Govt Code 68096.1(b) and 68097.2(b))

Subpoena Duces Tecum - $15 (CA Evidence Code 1563(b)(6))

46 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

So, you’ve just spent the last number of months developing a Cost of Services Study with recommendations to update your fees, and now you’re wondering how I get these adopted. In a future article we’

As a fee consultant, the question that I get asked most often is, “How often should we be updating our fees?” Once I dispose of the self-serving answer of, “Why, every year, of course,” that leads to

bottom of page